to human nature in my opinion.

You see the same mechanisms above which are often a resultant of the greed of man, can be found in nearly every human endeavor and thus would still be fou

Debating the merits of the current price system can be a challenge for any economist as we watch the manipulated nature of the game - whether it be the gambling casino we call the stock market, currency trading, market maker plays, commodity trading power plays or the Fed trying to shore up the resultant of international flows, government borrowing or greedy manipulations.

Technocrats will often debate that the price system is flawed and that money is a myth. Of course in the end this is silly, I have debated topics on the Technocracy Theme busted the theory in its absolute, not in its philosophical origin. I do not believe you could defeat the philosophy or principle, because it is "another way" to do things. In its absolute Technocracy falls short due to human nature in my opinion.

You see the same mechanisms above which are often a resultant of the greed of man, can be found in nearly every human endeavor and thus would still be foun

, currency trading, market maker plays, commodity trading power plays or the Fed trying to shore up the resultant of international flows, government borrowing or greedy manipulations.

Technocrats will often debate that the price system is flawed and that money is a myth. Of course in the end this is silly, I have debated topics on the Technocracy Theme busted the theory in its absolute, not in its philosophical origin. I do not believe you could defeat the philosophy or principle, because it is "another way" to do things. In its absolute Technocracy falls short due to human nature in my opinion.

You see the same mechanisms above which are often a resultant of the greed of man, can be found in nearly every human endeavor and thus would still be fou

chnocrats will often debate that the price system is flawed and that money is a myth. Of course in the end this is silly, I have debated topics on the Technocracy Theme busted the theory in its absolute, not in its philosophical origin. I do not believe you could defeat the philosophy or principle, because it is "another way" to do things. In its absolute Technocracy falls short due to human nature in my opinion.

You see the same mechanisms above which are often a resultant of the greed of man, can be found in nearly every human endeavor and thus would still be fou

absolute, not in its philosophical origin. I do not believe you could defeat the philosophy or principle, because it is "another way" to do things. In its absolute Technocracy falls short due to human nature in my opinion.

You see the same mechanisms above which are often a resultant of the greed of man, can be found in nearly every human endeavor and thus would still be fou

to human nature in my opinion.

You see the same mechanisms above which are often a resultant of the greed of man, can be found in nearly every human endeavor and thus would still be found in any technocracy scheme created to replace the price system in a hypothetical world. One cannot deny human nature.

At least with the price system more often the greedy man must produce if he wants more and then the whole of society is also a benefactor of that which he produces in order to get what he desires for self. Win-Win.

As far as those who call money a myth, well, Money is not a myth. It is an accepted "unit of trade" we all agree upon as a standard. Those who manipulate it do not believe in it, those who use the standard accept it. If it is accepted; IT is. If it is not then it is a myth to that individual. If it is a myth they then burn all your money to prove my point.