fix it you know? So, make less people, solve the real problems, rather than the band-aids. Today we can barely feed them, what about tomorrow when there are twice as many mouths to feed? What are you thoughts on that harsh reality?

Why are you against a one planet system? It might even be nice to take the best we have developed in the US and use that model, deleting the stuff that does not work. One World plan might actually be quite nice, so what's the problem? Spell it out, let's here the object

Many folks decry the New World Order, yet really it seems that they do not fully understand what they are talking about. As the coordinator for the Online Think Tank many people wish to warn us about the New World Order and ask if we know anything about this so-called conspiracy. What conspiracy? Actually yes I have heard of all this stuff.

My thoughts are that there are indeed too many people on the planet, yes, well I concur with that and unless, better infrastructure systems are built in order to handle these issues then we will continue to see problems and they will become bigger and bigger. Whether man-made or nature's equilibrium does not matter too much. Too many people on the planet is an issue and the World Population Clock ticketh. This problem must be addressed, we simply cannot sweep it under the carpet any longer.

The "New World Order" in concept is potentially better than the continued "resonance and heightened dissident fiery incited debate" leading to chaos and controversy, perhaps anarchy and collapse of human civilizations. It seems that the ideal population for Earth is probably 100 to 300 million or less per continent with proper modern infrastructures, which will be needed to be in place, prior to any increase. But, with regards to some continents the 100 - 300 million would be better set at a far reduced multiple.

We have too many people and they are over producing more people, like rats. Something needs to be done, the solutions are unthinkable indeed. You see, I am not against a "One World, one currency, one direction" plan or time table for this human occupied planet, with regional variations and a sense of freedom. There are too many people on the planet that would be hard to deny really. It's not very pretty.

Sure, living in the US seems doable but look at the infrastructure it takes to support it. Putting a Billion people in the Middle East, China or 2 billion in Africa is outrageous and the growth population rates are scary. We are doomed if we do not fix it you know? So, make less people, solve the real problems, rather than the band-aids. Today we can barely feed them, what about tomorrow when there are twice as many mouths to feed? What are you thoughts on that harsh reality?

Why are you against a one planet system? It might even be nice to take the best we have developed in the US and use that model, deleting the stuff that does not work. One World plan might actually be quite nice, so what's the problem? Spell it out, let's here the objecti

o handle these issues then we will continue to see problems and they will become bigger and bigger. Whether man-made or nature's equilibrium does not matter too much. Too many people on the planet is an issue and the World Population Clock ticketh. This problem must be addressed, we simply cannot sweep it under the carpet any longer.

The "New World Order" in concept is potentially better than the continued "resonance and heightened dissident fiery incited debate" leading to chaos and controversy, perhaps anarchy and collapse of human civilizations. It seems that the ideal population for Earth is probably 100 to 300 million or less per continent with proper modern infrastructures, which will be needed to be in place, prior to any increase. But, with regards to some continents the 100 - 300 million would be better set at a far reduced multiple.

We have too many people and they are over producing more people, like rats. Something needs to be done, the solutions are unthinkable indeed. You see, I am not against a "One World, one currency, one direction" plan or time table for this human occupied planet, with regional variations and a sense of freedom. There are too many people on the planet that would be hard to deny really. It's not very pretty.

Sure, living in the US seems doable but look at the infrastructure it takes to support it. Putting a Billion people in the Middle East, China or 2 billion in Africa is outrageous and the growth population rates are scary. We are doomed if we do not fix it you know? So, make less people, solve the real problems, rather than the band-aids. Today we can barely feed them, what about tomorrow when there are twice as many mouths to feed? What are you thoughts on that harsh reality?

Why are you against a one planet system? It might even be nice to take the best we have developed in the US and use that model, deleting the stuff that does not work. One World plan might actually be quite nice, so what's the problem? Spell it out, let's here the object

rhaps anarchy and collapse of human civilizations. It seems that the ideal population for Earth is probably 100 to 300 million or less per continent with proper modern infrastructures, which will be needed to be in place, prior to any increase. But, with regards to some continents the 100 - 300 million would be better set at a far reduced multiple.

We have too many people and they are over producing more people, like rats. Something needs to be done, the solutions are unthinkable indeed. You see, I am not against a "One World, one currency, one direction" plan or time table for this human occupied planet, with regional variations and a sense of freedom. There are too many people on the planet that would be hard to deny really. It's not very pretty.

Sure, living in the US seems doable but look at the infrastructure it takes to support it. Putting a Billion people in the Middle East, China or 2 billion in Africa is outrageous and the growth population rates are scary. We are doomed if we do not fix it you know? So, make less people, solve the real problems, rather than the band-aids. Today we can barely feed them, what about tomorrow when there are twice as many mouths to feed? What are you thoughts on that harsh reality?

Why are you against a one planet system? It might even be nice to take the best we have developed in the US and use that model, deleting the stuff that does not work. One World plan might actually be quite nice, so what's the problem? Spell it out, let's here the object

am not against a "One World, one currency, one direction" plan or time table for this human occupied planet, with regional variations and a sense of freedom. There are too many people on the planet that would be hard to deny really. It's not very pretty.

Sure, living in the US seems doable but look at the infrastructure it takes to support it. Putting a Billion people in the Middle East, China or 2 billion in Africa is outrageous and the growth population rates are scary. We are doomed if we do not fix it you know? So, make less people, solve the real problems, rather than the band-aids. Today we can barely feed them, what about tomorrow when there are twice as many mouths to feed? What are you thoughts on that harsh reality?

Why are you against a one planet system? It might even be nice to take the best we have developed in the US and use that model, deleting the stuff that does not work. One World plan might actually be quite nice, so what's the problem? Spell it out, let's here the object

fix it you know? So, make less people, solve the real problems, rather than the band-aids. Today we can barely feed them, what about tomorrow when there are twice as many mouths to feed? What are you thoughts on that harsh reality?

Why are you against a one planet system? It might even be nice to take the best we have developed in the US and use that model, deleting the stuff that does not work. One World plan might actually be quite nice, so what's the problem? Spell it out, let's here the objections and rational behind that debate? Well, come on now, time is wasting and the population clock ticket.