u customer choice. The government should never interfere with such a company, as they got there because people voted with their dollar.

In studying the FTC VS Bell or FTC VS Microsoft or even in the early days of Rockefeller, I see real problems with these cases. The government really di

As the operator of an Online Think Tank we spend quite a bit of time discussing Free-Markets and forms of government such as Capitalism and Communism, Socialism and Dictatorships and how all of it is so intertwined in World Markets.

You can imagine that many of the top lawyers in the country favor Constitutional Law and Anti-Trust Law as well. A relatively wise person would understand that it is best when government dismisses its self from engaging in the interference of supply and demand issues or free-markets right?

Absolutely. Now then there are two types of Entrepreneurs. Market Made and Government Made. Often entrepreneurs pursuing the very nature of Adam Smith's warnings will entice the government to put up barriers to the competition or have the government itself purchase or buy products from them in an incestuous relationship of some sort.

Truly this is not a REAL entrepreneur, because the real entrepreneur is one, which fairly negotiates with a buyer who is willing to depart with the unit of trade we call a dollar for the goods or services offered. If that entrepreneur captures nearly all of the market share it is because they won thru customer choice. The government should never interfere with such a company, as they got there because people voted with their dollar.

In studying the FTC VS Bell or FTC VS Microsoft or even in the early days of Rockefeller, I see real problems with these cases. The government really did

ntry favor Constitutional Law and Anti-Trust Law as well. A relatively wise person would understand that it is best when government dismisses its self from engaging in the interference of supply and demand issues or free-markets right?

Absolutely. Now then there are two types of Entrepreneurs. Market Made and Government Made. Often entrepreneurs pursuing the very nature of Adam Smith's warnings will entice the government to put up barriers to the competition or have the government itself purchase or buy products from them in an incestuous relationship of some sort.

Truly this is not a REAL entrepreneur, because the real entrepreneur is one, which fairly negotiates with a buyer who is willing to depart with the unit of trade we call a dollar for the goods or services offered. If that entrepreneur captures nearly all of the market share it is because they won thru customer choice. The government should never interfere with such a company, as they got there because people voted with their dollar.

In studying the FTC VS Bell or FTC VS Microsoft or even in the early days of Rockefeller, I see real problems with these cases. The government really di

eurs. Market Made and Government Made. Often entrepreneurs pursuing the very nature of Adam Smith's warnings will entice the government to put up barriers to the competition or have the government itself purchase or buy products from them in an incestuous relationship of some sort.

Truly this is not a REAL entrepreneur, because the real entrepreneur is one, which fairly negotiates with a buyer who is willing to depart with the unit of trade we call a dollar for the goods or services offered. If that entrepreneur captures nearly all of the market share it is because they won thru customer choice. The government should never interfere with such a company, as they got there because people voted with their dollar.

In studying the FTC VS Bell or FTC VS Microsoft or even in the early days of Rockefeller, I see real problems with these cases. The government really di

this is not a REAL entrepreneur, because the real entrepreneur is one, which fairly negotiates with a buyer who is willing to depart with the unit of trade we call a dollar for the goods or services offered. If that entrepreneur captures nearly all of the market share it is because they won thru customer choice. The government should never interfere with such a company, as they got there because people voted with their dollar.

In studying the FTC VS Bell or FTC VS Microsoft or even in the early days of Rockefeller, I see real problems with these cases. The government really di

u customer choice. The government should never interfere with such a company, as they got there because people voted with their dollar.

In studying the FTC VS Bell or FTC VS Microsoft or even in the early days of Rockefeller, I see real problems with these cases. The government really did the wrong thing and should not be allowed to interfere. Read this book;

http://ezinearticles.com/?How-Capitalism-Saved-America-by-Thomas-J.-DiLorenzo&id=256437

And if you can find the book by Smoot, as he discusses Big Business and Big Government you might learn a bit too.

You see, competition is good for America and the strong should survive, of course everyone loses when we prop up industries, because we make them weak and wasteful and with barriers to entry they are not challenged to performance. Call me a Friedman, Greenspan economist if you will, but it is time for government to ditch the bureaucracy, stop tilting the playing field and receive their reality check. I hope this article makes you think long and hard in 2007.